首页> 外文OA文献 >Trust in telemedicine portals for rehabilitation care: an exploratory focus group study with patients and healthcare professionals
【2h】

Trust in telemedicine portals for rehabilitation care: an exploratory focus group study with patients and healthcare professionals

机译:信任远程医疗门户网站的康复护理:与患者和医疗保健专业人员进行的探索性焦点小组研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: For many eServices, end-user trust is a crucial prerequisite for use. Within the context of Telemedicine, the role of trust has hardly ever been studied. In this study, we explored what determines trust in portals that facilitate rehabilitation therapy, both from the perspective of the patient and the healthcare professional. Methods: We held two focus groups with patients (total n = 15) and two with healthcare professionals (total n = 13) in which we discussed when trust matters, what makes up trust in a rehabilitation portal, what effect specific design cues have, and how much the participants trust the use of activity sensor data for informing treatment. Results: Trust in a rehabilitation portal is the sum of trust in different factors. These factors and what makes up these factors differ for patients and healthcare professionals. For example, trust in technology is made up, for patients, mostly by a perceived level of control and privacy, while for healthcare professionals, a larger and different set of issues play a role, including technical reliability and a transparent data storage policy. Healthcare professionals distrust activity sensor data for informing patient treatment, as they think that sensors are unable to record the whole range of movements that patients make (e.g., walking and ironing clothes). Conclusions: The set of factors that affect trust in a rehabilitation portal are different from the sets that have been found for other contexts, like eCommerce. Trust in telemedicine technology should be studied as a separate subject to inform the design of reliable interventions.
机译:背景:对于许多电子服务,最终用户信任是使用的关键先决条件。在远程医疗的背景下,很少研究信任的作用。在这项研究中,我们从患者和医护人员的角度探讨了什么因素决定了对促进康复治疗的门户的信任。方法:我们将两个焦点小组与患者(总计n = 15)和两个医疗保健专业人员(总计n = 13)进行了讨论,其中讨论了信任何时重要,对康复门户网站的信任是什么,特定设计提示有什么作用,以及参与者有多信任使用活动传感器数据来通知治疗。结果:对康复门户网站的信任是对不同因素的信任总和。这些因素以及构成这些因素的因素对于患者和医疗保健专业人员而言是不同的。例如,对技术的信任主要是由患者对控制和隐私的感知程度来组成的,而对于医疗保健专业人员而言,则是一大堆不同的问题在起作用,包括技术可靠性和透明的数据存储策略。医护人员不相信活动传感器数据来告知患者治疗,因为他们认为传感器无法记录患者进行的整个动作范围(例如走路和熨烫衣服)。结论:影响康复门户网站信任的因素集与针对其他环境(例如电子商务)发现的因素集不同。对远程医疗技术的信任应作为单独的主题进行研究,以告知可靠干预措施的设计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号